USA Funds Career Development Loan Program (CDLP)
This
program is for institutions only. This program is not for individual students.
INDEX
Purpose of the Career Development
Loan Program (CDLP):
The School Evaluation
Process for Existing CDLP Schools:
Rating System
Default Performance
Rate
Cumulative
Rate
Cohort
Default Rate
Composite
Score/Category Ranking
Cumulative
Default Rate/Adjustment Factor
Category 1 Schools
Category 2 Schools
Category 3 Schools
Composite
score/Annual Guarantee
Category 4 Schools
Requirements for approval and review
Appeal Process for category
3 or category 4 schools
The CDLP Process for New
Schools
for
more information regarding the Career Development Loan Program click
here
Purpose of the Career Development Loan Program (CDLP):
USA Funds maintains the CDLP to ensure that proprietary institutions participating
in its guaranty program satisfy the standards of administrative capability as
defined in federal regulation (34 CFR Part 668). The CDLP monitors important
attributes that allow the CDLP Committee to work closely with proprietary institutions
in evaluating their participation, when appropriate. Each school is evaluated
by USA Funds annually to ensure that the institutions administrative capability
profile meets acceptable levels to protect the integrity of the Federal Family
Education Loan Program for students and schools.
A cross-functional committee oversees the administration of the program. The
committee is comprised of members of USA funds and USA Educations management
who provide diverse business perspectives in evaluating a schools overall administrative
capabilities
Support for the CDLP is found in 34 CFR 682.401(b) and in private letters from
the U.S. Department of Education.
Back to index
The School Evaluation Process for Existing
CDLP Schools:
The CDLP evaluation process provides a measure of reliance on the schools administrative
capability as defined in 34 CFR 668.16. Each school is first evaluated on a
number of different default rate measures. This evaluation is performed with
data available to USA Funds and does not require the school to initially provide
any information. The default rate measures used to perform the preliminary
analysis of each school include:
C
The Cohort Default Rate for the latest fiscal year - This rate measures the
cohort of borrowers that enter into repayment in a given year and default either
in the year repayment began or in the subsequent year.
C
USA Funds Default Performance Rate - This rate is calculated by dividing
the total dollars of bad debt purchases in a given year by the total dollar
amount of loans outstanding at the end of the prior year.
C
USA funds Cumulative Gross Default Rate This rate divides
the total dollar of default purchases by the total dollars
of matured paper from the point in time when the school became
a USA Funds client through the current date. Back
to index
Using the above default rates, a composite score for each school is determined.
The composite score is determined by assigning a point factor to each of the
three default rate measures and adding the factors together. The point system
for each of the rates and the composite score are determined using the following
methodology:
|
Default Performance Rate
|
|
Cumulative Rate
|
|
Cohort Default Rate
|
|
Actual Rate
|
Score
|
|
Actual Rate
|
Score
|
|
Actual Rate
|
Score
|
|
< 5.0%
|
0
|
|
< 10.0%
|
0
|
|
< 5.0%
|
0
|
|
>= 5.0% < 10.0%
|
0.25
|
|
>=10.0% < 15.0%
|
0.5
|
|
>= 5.0% < 10.0%
|
0.25
|
|
>= 10.0% < 15.0%
|
0.5
|
|
>= 15.0% < 20.0%
|
0.75
|
|
>= 10.0% < 15.0%
|
0.5
|
|
>= 15.0% < 20.0%
|
1
|
|
>= 20.0% < 25.0%
|
1
|
|
>= 15.0% < 20.0%
|
1
|
|
>= 20%
|
1.25
|
|
>= 25.0% < 30.0%
|
1.25
|
|
>= 20.0%
|
1.25
|
| |
|
|
>= 30.0%
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
The composite score is then determined by aggregating the point factors in
each category:
|
Composite Score
|
Ranking
|
|
< 1.5
|
Category 1
|
|
>= 1.5 < 2.5
|
Category 2
|
|
>= 2.5 < 3.5
|
Category 3
|
|
>= 3.5
|
Category 4
|
Back to index
Once a schools initial composite score has been determined, an adjustment
to this score will be made to reward those schools that have successfully reduced
their cumulative default rates. The adjustment amount is based upon the schools
overall cumulative default rate as follows:
|
Cumulative Default Rate
|
Adjustment Factor
|
|
>= 30%
|
-0.75
|
|
>= 25% < 30%
|
-1.00
|
|
< 25%
|
The negative impact of cumulative rate is removed.
|
Back to index
Schools for which the cumulative default rate has risen will have no adjustments
made to the composite score. After the adjustments have been made, each schools
categorization is final.
Category 1 Schools
These schools are not subject to any restrictions and are given an unlimited
funding amount for new loan guarantees during the next year.
The school will be sent a letter annually notifying them of
their designation as a Category 1 school. The school will
not have to sign an annual participation agreement as long
as it remains in Category 1.
Back to index
Category 2 Schools
These schools are given unlimited funding for guarantees, however, the school
will be required to submit a default management plan for review and approval
by USA Funds. Upon the schools request and the availability of resources
within USA Funds or its designee, assistance will be provided in the development
and implementation of the default management plan. Each school is required
to sign a participation agreement with USA Funds annually. The school will
be sent a letter notifying them of their designation as a Category 2 school
along with the agreement that must be signed and returned to USA Funds.
Back to index
Category 3 Schools
The school will receive a limited funding allocation for the next year. This
amount will be determined using the schools average annual loan volume
for the last three years of operation and will be scaled based upon the total
composite score as follows:
| Composite Score |
Annual Guarantee Volume Limitation |
|
>= 2.50 < 2.75
|
90% of the average annual volume
|
|
>= 2.75 < 3.00
|
80% of the average annual volume
|
|
>= 3.00
|
70% of the average annual volume
|
Back to index
The school will be required to submit a default
management plan to USA Funds for review and approval. Upon the schools
request and the availability of resources within USA Funds or its designee,
assistance will be provided in the development and implementation of the default
management plan at no cost to the school. Each school is required to sign a
participation agreement with USA Funds annually. The school will be sent a
letter notifying them of their designation as a Category 3 school along with
the agreement that must be signed and returned to USA Funds.
In addition, the school will be instructed to fill out a questionnaire and
provide additional documentation for review. Category 3 schools may be subject
to the following additional requirements:
- USA Funds may instruct the Debt Management unit within USA Education to
work individually with school officials to develop specific default reduction
objectives that the school is expected to accomplish within a 3-year period.
The school will be required to submit an annual report to USA Funds outlining
the progress made on the established objectives.
- The school may undergo a compliance review to be conducted by USA Funds
to verify the schools overall administrative capability.
- If the school fails to meet the 3-year objectives outlined in its default
management plan, or if findings from any program review conducted by USA Funds
determines the school lacks the necessary administrative capability, the school
may be denied further participation in the CDLP.
- The school may be required to send new and/or existing employees through
USA Funds Boot Camp and/or specially designed default prevention workshops.
Back to index
Category 4 Schools
Schools that reach this threshold are denied further participation in USA Funds
CDLP. In the event of a schools denial, the school will be given a grace
period of 30 days in which to secure a new guarantor relationship. After the
30-day period, USA Funds will cease to guarantee applications for new borrowers
attending the school. Existing borrowers, however, will continue to be funded
through the remainder of their enrollment at the school.
Back to index
Appeal Process for Category 3 or Category 4 Schools
Category 3 schools that have had funding reduced, or Category 4 schools that
have been denied further participation, may submit an appeal to USA Funds for
special consideration. The appeal process is designed for those schools that
have exceptional mitigating circumstances that have contributed to its high
default rates, and are unrelated to any shortcomings in the schools administration
of its programs. Documentation that must be submitted by the school for consideration
may include, but is not limited to, the following:
- The schools admissions policies regarding student enrollment;
- The population of students the school serves (i.e., service to an economically
disadvantaged population);
- The schools graduation and placement rates and other statistical
information (e.g., a listing of placed students along with the place of employment
and telephone number of employer);
- The schools accreditation status relating to quality of education
issues;
- The schools financial responsibility profile as outlined in 34 CFR
Part 668.
After reviewing the appeal documentation, USA Funds may increase a Category
3 schools approved funding amount. USA Funds may also
allow continued participation for Category 4 schools at a
limited or full funding basis. Schools will be notified in
writing of the outcome of any filed appeal.
Back to index
The CDLP Process for New Schools:
Schools that have been in existence for a period of time long enough to have
available cohort default rate information will be automatically admitted into
the CDLP, provided that the cohort default rate for the latest fiscal year is
less than or equal to 10%.
Any school that has a cohort default rate greater than 10%, or any school that
is new to the Title IV loan programs will be required to fill out a questionnaire
and provide additional documentation for review and consideration. The school
information will be evaluated by the CDLP committee on a case-by-case basis
to determine the schools acceptance into the CDLP.
A school that is denied access to the CDLP will be notified in writing of the
denial. Approved schools will be notified in writing and will be provided a
copy of this document to provide the institution with an understanding of USA
Funds CDLP evaluation process.
A new school will be required to sign a participation agreement, but will be
given unlimited funding in the first year. After the first year of participation,
the school will be subject to the annual evaluation process for existing schools.
Back to index
|